Saltar al contenido principal
Methodology

How WhatBusiness.ai builds a business match

Trace how an assessment answer becomes a ranked, explainable direction through verified research inputs, published product rules, structured conflicts, and ordered result roles.

Direct answer: RIASEC informs the vocational-interest layer. Reported skill areas and experience, resources, goals, operating preferences, and explicit constraints complete the profile. Published custom rules then rank structured business opportunities by fit and feasibility.

Published methodology record

Scoring rules
v1.2.0
Opportunity library
v3.1.0
Editorial owner
Lucas Vicente
Source verification
Completed and mapped

Evidence trace

Each layer has a clear job

The trace separates the verified source, the vocational construct it informs, the custom WhatBusiness.ai rule, the resulting match, and the buyer test that provides demand evidence.

Source evidence

Verified published source

Research or official documentation checked and mapped to a specific claim.

Example: the official O*NET Mini Interest Profiler development report documents a 30-item RIASEC instrument for career exploration.

This source informs the vocational-interest layer used by WhatBusiness.ai.

Base fit

Five inputs form the base score

The matcher scores every opportunity in the curated library against the same five dimensions. RIASEC interests remain continuous combinations rather than a single type. Skills are reported as broad areas plus an overall experience level. Operating preferences capture choices such as online or local and B2B or B2C. Personality scoring is outside the assessment scope.

Interests and activity fit

30%

Skills and experience

25%

Resources and access

20%

Goals and urgency

10%

Operating preferences

15%

Published rule: these five weights are custom WhatBusiness.ai product rules in scoring version 1.2.0. Behavioral outcomes—including completion, result engagement, idea selection, rejection, and paid demand—inform future calibration.

Conflict checks

Constraints do not disappear inside a score

Budget, weekly time, revenue timing, physical work, travel, cold selling, regulation, hiring, and home-only requirements are checked separately from base fit. An opportunity that crosses a stated boundary receives a ranking penalty and a plain-language conflict.

Current scoring rule

Adjusted rank = base fit − conflict penalties

Budget overrun
0.30 × proportional overrun
Weekly-time overrun
0.24 × proportional overrun
Revenue-deadline overrun
0.16 × proportional overrun
Each categorical conflict
0.32

These coefficients are published implementation rules in scoring version 1.2.0. Every detected conflict remains visible when a near match fills an open result role.

Ordered output

How we fill the three result roles

We fill these roles in order. Each role uses an unused exact match while one is available. After exact matches are exhausted, any remaining role may use a clearly labelled near match that discloses every conflict and states that it is not feasible as-is. Revenue timing and upside are estimates stored in our opportunity library, not predictions.

  1. Best overall match

    Selects the unused candidate with the highest adjusted fit.

    Result role
  2. Fastest realistic path to revenue

    Prefers a different business family and the lowest stored estimate for time to first revenue among unused candidates.

    Result role
  3. Higher-upside alternative

    Prefers a different business family and the strongest combination of stored upside rating and adjusted fit among unused candidates.

    Result role

We prefer different business families where suitable unused candidates are available, but diversity is not guaranteed.

Structured selection, bounded explanation

Curated opportunities come first

Candidate directions come from a curated, structured opportunity library. Deterministic code applies the scores, conflict checks, and result roles. Generative AI then explains, personalizes, niches, and creates bounded variants using the selected opportunity and supplied profile data.

Comparison of Deterministic layer and Generative layer

Deterministic layer

Controls what can be selected and why it ranks.

Inputs
Structured assessment answers
Candidates
Curated opportunity library
Output
Scores, conflicts, ordered roles

Usually stronger when: the product must be inspectable, testable, and repeatable.

Generative layer

Turns selected records into clearer personal guidance.

Inputs
Selected record plus profile facts
Boundary
Cannot replace or add a candidate
Output
Explanation and bounded variants

Usually stronger when: specific language makes a structured result easier to act on.

Product scope

What each layer establishes

RIASEC provides the vocational-interest structure. WhatBusiness.ai publishes the custom weights, mappings, conflict policy, opportunity library, and three-role selection logic used to turn a profile into business directions.

Sources are verified and mapped to the specific vocational constructs and product claims they support.

Matching weights, opportunity mappings, conflict rules, and result roles are custom published WhatBusiness.ai product rules.

The assessment scores interests, reported skill areas and experience, resources, goals, operating preferences, and constraints. Personality scoring is outside its scope.

Each match explains personal fit and feasibility. A buyer test with real customers provides direct evidence about demand.

Attribution

O*NET interest activities

The interest section uses the 30 O*NET Mini Interest Profiler activity statements to produce six continuous RIASEC interest scores. Those scores are then used as one input to a separate WhatBusiness.ai business-opportunity ranking model. WhatBusiness.ai changes the downstream purpose and output: it ranks a curated business-opportunity library rather than returning occupations for career exploration.

Required attribution and modification notice

This product includes information from the O*NET Career Exploration Tools by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the O*NET Tools Developer License. O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. WhatBusiness.ai has modified all or some of this information. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications.

WhatBusiness.ai has modified the purpose of the O*NET® Career Exploration Tools. The U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA) has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications. As such, USDOL/ETA will not be liable to any third party or end-user for any damages arising out of or from the use or misuse of the modified O*NET Career Exploration Tools or any products incorporating or containing the modified O*NET Career Exploration Tools.

Read modifications and disclaimers

Apply the published framework to your own constraints

Get three explainable directions and a practical next step.

Start the assessment