Lucas Vicente · Editorial owner · 11 minute guide · Published and reviewed 1 August 2026
Source verification completed. Library time, cost, and activity tags are current WhatBusiness.ai product estimates.
Start with skill evidence a buyer can inspect
A skill is a capability you can perform. Evidence is a recent example, result, artifact, qualification, feedback, or record of repeated use. A buyer problem is the concrete situation another person will pay to change. An offer is the smallest deliverable that connects the first three.
Begin with what you have actually done, identify who benefited, make the strongest proof inspectable, and choose a delivery model that can be tested inside your time, money, access, and regulatory boundaries. Buyer response then provides the demand evidence.
Use this guide to
- Separate reported skill areas from evidence a buyer can inspect
- Translate one capability into several possible business models
- Choose a bounded test instead of assuming capability proves demand
Map what you have done to a smallest offer
Choose up to three concrete activities, then describe where and when you used each one, who benefited, and what proof remains. The tool returns at most one bounded library direction per activity without assigning a capability score, and the answers stay in your browser.
Build an evidence profile
Your answers stay in this browser and are never included in analytics.
Your evidence-based offers will appear here
Complete the required details to generate up to three small offers grounded in what you have already done.
Privacy boundary: all selections and optional notes stay in local React state. Analytics receives only that the tool was completed—not the activities, evidence, beneficiary, recency, or note.
Complete the comparison
Want to apply the rest of your profile?
The matcher combines reported skill areas and overall experience, continuous vocational interests, resources, goals, operating preferences, and explicit constraints. Each result role is filled by an unused exact match while one is available; after exact matches are exhausted, any open role may use a clearly labelled near match that explicitly states it is not feasible as-is. Every conflict is disclosed.
Compare my full profileNo email is required to begin. Each match explains personal fit and ends with a buyer test for demand.
Build an evidence chain before building an offer
Frequency and recency help separate a one-off exposure from a capability you can still use. Confidence helps decide what to attempt, while observable proof gives a buyer something concrete to inspect. A buying conversation completes the chain with direct demand evidence.
Did it
Name the task, setting, beneficiary, and your actual responsibility.
Repeated it
Show that the capability survived more than one occasion or context.
Improved it
Point to a result, before-and-after example, or feedback without inflating causation.
Can explain or reproduce it
Make the method visible enough for a buyer to inspect a sample or bounded first delivery.
A meta-analysis of human capital and entrepreneurial outcomes reported a small overall association and stronger relationships for task-related knowledge and skills than broad education or experience. That research supports the focus on task-related evidence; the matcher’s 25% skills weight remains a published WhatBusiness.ai product assumption. Inspect the source record.
One capability can support different delivery models
Choose the delivery model that makes the evidence easiest for a buyer to evaluate. The same capability can become a focused service, repeatable sprint, reusable product, or guided implementation, with different proof required for each.
Focused service
- Buyer
- A buyer with one specific problem that can be scoped before delivery.
- Deliverable
- A review, repair, analysis, session, or implementation with a clear handover.
- Strongest evidence required
- A recent example of performing the core task for a comparable beneficiary.
Productized service
- Buyer
- A group of similar buyers facing the same recurring operating problem.
- Deliverable
- A fixed sprint with declared inputs, steps, exclusions, and completion criteria.
- Strongest evidence required
- Repeated delivery plus proof that the workflow is stable enough to standardise.
Product or template
- Buyer
- People who repeat a decision or task and can use an artifact without bespoke delivery.
- Deliverable
- A calculator, checklist, guide, template, kit, or other bounded asset.
- Strongest evidence required
- A validated method, visible assumptions, edge cases, and target-user testing.
Training or implementation
- Buyer
- A learner or team that needs to perform the task rather than outsource it indefinitely.
- Deliverable
- Instruction, practice, feedback, setup, and a maintainable handover.
- Strongest evidence required
- Current subject competence and evidence that another person can apply what you teach.
Worked profile: three skills, three materially different offers
Reported profile inputs: Operations and process + Software or technical systems + Administration or finance. Current library tags connect those inputs to the three materially different packaging paths below. Buyer conversations determine which path has demand.
CRM data hygiene sprint
Online B2B service · €100 floor · 5–10 hours a week · 2–6 weeks to first revenue estimate
- Buyer
- Small B2B sales teams with an unreliable contact database.
- Problem
- Duplicate, stale, and incomplete records make the pipeline difficult to trust.
- Skill areas used
- Operations supports field rules and a repeatable cleanup; technical systems supports CRM handling; administration and finance supports accuracy and controlled records.
- Next validation and required inputs
- Fluency in one CRM, a secure data-handling process, a written merge and deletion policy, backups, access controls, and client sign-off.
Smallest credible version: Clean one pipeline and document five field rules for a team with fewer than 2,000 contacts.
Vendor-risk evidence room setup
Online B2B service · €100 floor · 5–10 hours a week · 2–6 weeks to first revenue estimate
- Buyer
- Small B2B vendors repeatedly sharing security evidence.
- Problem
- Policies, certificates, diagrams, and diligence answers are scattered or shared too broadly.
- Skill areas used
- Operations supports ownership and expiry routines; technical systems supports permissioned storage; administration supports document control.
- Next validation and required inputs
- A classification scheme, named owners and expiry metadata, permission and redaction rules, and competence to avoid making security claims.
Smallest credible version: Organise 25 approved documents with owners, expiry dates, and three access tiers.
Niche calculator templates
Online B2B product · €100 floor · 5–10 hours a week · 6–12 weeks to first revenue estimate
- Buyer
- Operators who repeatedly estimate the same job, margin, or capacity by hand.
- Problem
- A familiar commercial calculation is slow, inconsistent, or hidden inside one person’s process.
- Skill areas used
- Administration and finance supports the calculation; technical systems supports implementation; operations supports assumptions, edge cases, and repeatable use.
- Next validation and required inputs
- A calculation validated against real practice, visible assumptions, ten historical checks, and five target users willing to test it.
Smallest credible version: Pre-sell one calculator, test it on ten historical examples, and deliver it with a one-page guide.
These are three unranked packaging paths from overlapping reported skill areas. Their budget floors, weekly bands, revenue ranges, skill tags, requirements, and smallest versions are WhatBusiness.ai estimates and product assumptions.
Turn one direction into a bounded credibility test
The next step is not a brand, website, or large product build. It is a small sequence that exposes whether your evidence transfers to a buyer’s real problem.
Choose one buyer
Name a specific person or organisation with a repeated problem—not “small businesses” in general.
Define one deliverable
State the input, output, boundary, handover, and what the offer explicitly excludes.
Gather one proof example
Show a safe artifact, before-and-after example, result, feedback record, or recreated sample.
Test one buying conversation
Ask what evidence, access, price, and risk would be required before the buyer could say yes.
Questions and limits
Can transferable skills support a business outside my industry?
Sometimes. Transfer is stronger when the activity, beneficiary, delivery conditions, and evidence remain comparable. Industry knowledge, access, regulation, and buyer language may still be missing.
What if I do not have a formal credential?
Use work samples, measured results, feedback, or repeated use where the activity is unregulated. If the work requires a licence, certification, insurance, or protected professional role, remove it for now or obtain qualified guidance; informal experience does not replace the requirement.
Can a beginner have useful evidence?
Yes, but label the boundary. A supervised project, course artifact, volunteer result, or personal responsibility can support a small test without proving independent commercial delivery.
Should I combine several skills?
Combine skills when they meet inside one buyer problem and deliverable. A long list of capabilities is not automatically more valuable and can make the offer harder to understand.
Is enjoying a skill enough?
No. Enjoyment can support persistence, but the direction still needs evidence, buyer need, feasible delivery, tolerable constraints, and a smallest test. Interests and skills are separate inputs.
Validate commercial and professional boundaries. Confirm buyer demand, current competence, required credentials, insurance, permissions, and the delivery conditions for the specific offer before selling it.
ESCO provides an authoritative taxonomy reference. The current assessment records broad reported skill areas and an overall experience level rather than implementing an ESCO dataset mapping. See the source and usage record, then inspect how skills enter the custom score in the methodology. source and usage record · methodology.
Sources and editorial verification
This guide separates verified research inputs from WhatBusiness.ai’s custom decision framework. RIASEC informs vocational interests; published product rules define the matching weights, mappings, conflicts, and result roles. A buyer test provides direct evidence about demand.
1. Journal of Business Venturing
Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical reviewA peer-reviewed meta-analysis of 70 independent samples and 24,733 participants examining human capital and entrepreneurial outcomes.
2. European Commission
The ESCO classificationAn authoritative multilingual taxonomy reference for future skills and occupations work.
- Editorial owner
- Lucas Vicente
- Source verification
- Completed 1 August 2026 for the sources listed above
- Methodology status
- Published and mapped to product rules
- Next source review
- 1 September 2026
Next decision